This is a question that shows up in various forms, such as, “If everyone awakens, will we all starve?” Usually, this is an excuse to justify the fear that causes us to not pursue what we truly want. Not being courageous enough to pursue our goals is ok, its the denial that that is the real issue is what will hold you back. The first thing is to acknowledge it. Courage is like a muscle and you are simply a bit weaker than your goal requires. However denial will only hurt you in the long run.

That, I believe, is the real reason people ask this question. It’s easy to feel good about yourself if everyone else is also stuck in the same place, or if you can assign some external reason for why you are not doing what you really want to do but don’t have the courage to right now. Those reasons enumerated, I do want to answer the question as asked:

Like I said previously, a massive change like everyone following their dreams will not happen suddenly. If anything, it could be argued that its been happening slowly over the last many decades. Massive social changes like that rarely happen very quickly (they’re called revolutions if they do). “For example, if everyone did what they felt their purpose was and there were no garbage-collectors left, this is some of what might happen: 1. The wages for a garbage collector would skyrocket. 2. People would have to clean up after themselves. 3. There would be a greater demand for solutions that didn’t require humans or as many humans, such as automated cleaning machines, and the people who really enjoy solving society’s problems using technology would love to create that.”

There are every kind of people. Paul taught me about this. This may sound really, really strange to you, but there are people who ENJOY being garbage collectors. The Fred Factor is a book about a postman who brings so much joy and purpose to his work. Most people would think that being a post delivery person would be dreary and boring, but Fred loves his work. The value of these people who really love to do this would go up dramatically because they are so rare, so they could actually make a lot of money doing something that others would consider “dreary”.

Finally, we, as a species/culture, can adapt to massive social changes such as if everyone is starting to follow their dreams. We’ve gone through a number before now. For example, I’m willing to bet that someone said at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, “What if everyone went to work in jobs in factories and left the farms; we’d all starve!”. And we have not starved. This henny penny, “the sky is falling” stuff is usually overrated.

Let’s say there was suddenly a severe shortage in the number of postal workers. Courier businesses would probably skyrocket, people would stop sending as many letters (as they have), the wages of postal workers would skyrocket, faxes and emails would grow much greater in number, many entrepreneurs would step in to attempt to come up with solutions that are cheaper and/or more efficient than the current system. Perhaps instead of getting mail delivered to our doors, each neighbourhood or block would get its own central mail box racks where you go to pick up the mail, like a PO Box, this is pretty common in many places around the world.

 

I try to stay out of politics, especially forgein ones, however my hero, Jordan Peterson, recently did a wonderful interview about American politics. He highlighted what he believed to be the source of the problems, which is a fundamental lack of trust in the reigning politicians. He also suggested that modern day politics includes too much marketing and too much spin, and it’s hard to trust. I agree with that. His talk reminded me of a social trap, or the tragedy of the commons where the individual actors working for their own self-interest has a negative effect on a social resource, leading to overexploitation and eventually the destruction of this resource.

Here’s an example of a recent social trap in one of my classes, Learning and Plasticity. The heating is busted so its always way too hot in the winter. This problem is made worse by the 35 or so computers in the room every class, which generate a lot of heat and ruin the social resource of a comfortable temperature for all. Therein lies the problem: the advantages of bringing a laptop to class is borne by the one person, while the costs of bringing a laptop to class is borne by everyone. While it is in the interest of those people who bring laptops to not bring it or use it less, they have no garuntees that others will refrain from bringing their laptops, and you need there to be about a maximum of ten laptops in the room every class. Classic tragedy of the commons situation.

The social capital, in the case of American politics, is trust in the politicians, and this has been declining since the Nixon years. There is this deep-seated distrust and skepticism about the government that comes into the media after Nixon, which has extended itself to Canada, too, even though our government is maybe half as corrupt (though still corrupt!). And while it may be favourable for an individual politician to use spin and marketing for their own gain, this further erodes the social capital of trust in the system and in politicians in general.

I dunno what good way there is out of this, and I’m not really interested in finding one. I just wanted to point out some interesting parralells between my class and the American political system, and also that working solely for individual self-interest fails. There has be an eye towards working for both self-interest and the interest of others involved to create Win/Win situations. Else worse things happen.

Further reading if you’re interested:

Wikipedia – Social Trap

Wikipedia – Tragedy of the Commons

© 2012 Mind-Manual Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha